With the
EAV can be made a
detailed evaluation of the actual health functions which is in a wider
context, there are different explanations and solutions:
● Immunologic approach: an
active
immune system is essential.
● Evolutionary medical approach: The evolutionary medicine studies the
human evolution during millions of years, the development of Homo
sapiens and how the vigorous, the healthy and the happy survives.
Reading
tip: Daniel E. Lieberman: The story of the human body - Evolution,
health and disease – the author writes interestingly about the
historical context of the impact of too much or too little stimuli
(cf. with the
states
of inflammation or exhaustion of the actual
individual EAV evaluations)
● Genetic approach: It’s also interesting that only two percent of our
genes are different from our next relatives, the primates. Here
arises the question, why is so much invested in genetic tests when
they a) in the majority of cases, only permit to predict the
probability of a manifestation of genetic disorders and b) represent
literally a modern looking for a needle in a (digital) haystack.
Besides that,
epigenetics studies the gene activation /
repression of sequences of genomes in our genetic mosaic and which
environmental and
nutritional factors have a
key role and can be actively influenced. Too often we keep,
consciously or unconsciously, unhealthy habits and justify their
consequences saying “that’s genetic, it runs in the family”.
● About the question of the most favorable nutrition: Information
about traditional local eating habits BEFORE the invasion of the food
industry can avoid polemic discussions.
Reading
tip: Weston A Price: Nutrition and Physical Degeneration
●
Invasive / non invasive treatments: Even with massive
investments in the development of imaging procedures – indirectly
thanks the huge success of the Beatles before having founded their own
label Apple Records (
Goodman 2010) – and
therefore more anatomical details became visible, this must not
signify that an immediate chirurgical intervention is mandatory
imperative to automatically remove / fix / transplant all anatomical
variations, because a
later
image finding after optimization of the functions of the
organism with a targeted treatment based on an EAV diagnosis can show
a regression without recurrence of these variations which can result
in a good prognosis. Also with Feldenkrais exercises (leitmotif: do
not force any movement) can one discover the corporal fluidity and,
e.g., proactively relieve discomforts, tensions, pains of the back,
knees, hips, shoulder (
Reading tip: Awareness Through Movement).
The pioneers Reinhold Voll (who lived for decades with a permanent
catheter after unsuccessful chirurgical interventions) and Moshe
Feldenkrais (who found a way that his, as a young man during sport
activities seriously injured knee stayed functional without a
“mandatory” surgical intervention – later he received as first
European the Black Belt in judo) who created, independently of each
other, fundamentals of knowledge of the possibilities how to stimulate
the self-regulation of humans. This knowledge is available and can be
put into practice with experienced diagnosticians and therapists.
The
big advantage of these methods is that they contribute
substantially to prevention and regeneration, both also avoid
notably well-known iatrogenic harm BEFORE starting a treatment.
In case of visual impairment one can also recommend eye exercises
based on the Bates method (
Reading tip: Perfect Sight Without
Glasses). For treating psychological traumas and blocks, Viktor
Frankl has developed (based on the experiences lived during his
internment in a concentration camp) a solution-focused brief therapy
which integrates a respectful humor;
his and Paul Watzlawick’s
works are worth reading. All these methods with different
approaches, to which one can add without hesitation the traditional
meditation, improve the agility of body and mind (neuroplasticity).
Other non-invasive and non-traumatic treatment methods should produce
neither physical nor psychological dependence and fulfill some of the
following criteria:
Maintaining and recovering health has many aspects:
a) guarantee the greatest possible independence,
b) take the responsibility for the own body (and to a
certain degree also for the loved ones),
c) work in partnership with therapists who have empathy
and goodwill and
c1) pay also attention to early
symptoms and
c2) provide individual treatments of
personal issues and
c3) avoid over- and under-treatment,
d) openness to organic learning.
Finally, approximately 70 percent of the illnesses we treat are
preventable (
Russo 2011).
All this consolidated for youngsters: With the good practices
mentioned above one can increase the efficiency and harmony of the own
body functions, put down the burden of the mind and so invest
concretely in the own (and not artificial) intelligence and
self-determined (not determined by others) life quality. Instead of
permanent distraction or efforts to understand worrying symptoms (hi,
internet doctor!) one can promote an
integrated approach of the
body consciousness. And another question for the adepts of
conspiratory theories: These are considered as very smart who
profitably participate in capital cycles of different industries
(food, beverage, tobacco, pharmaceutical and hospital etc.) which
products, when consumed in excess, first endanger health and then only
relieve symptoms - is it possible that some apparently happy Homo
oeconomicus are ready to subordinate everything to their financial
necessities? Really everything?
Sources:
Goodman L. The Beatles, the Nobel Prize, and CT
Scanning of the Chest, Radiologic Clinics of North America Jan 2010
Russo, P. “Population health” in Health Care
Delivery in the United States. New York, Springer, 2011, p.85-102)